Request a storefront

LinkToLooks · Guides

How do you make a media kit that a brand actually reads?

Part of: The business of being a creatorFor creators

A media kit is a one-to-two page document that answers three questions for a stranger: who your audience is, what you can make, and how to reach you. It is a sales document, not a portfolio.

The single most common mistake is optimising it for how it looks rather than for how fast it can be skimmed by someone with forty of them open.

What a media kit is actually for

Someone brand-side has a budget, a deadline and a shortlist. Your media kit exists to move you from the long list to the short one, and it gets perhaps ninety seconds to do it. That is the entire job. It is not there to express your aesthetic, and it is not a portfolio — the portfolio is your account, which they will open in another tab regardless.

Two consequences follow, and almost every weak media kit ignores both:

What a brand reader opens first

Diagram of a media kit ordered by what a brand reader opens first: identity and audience numbers at the top of page one, past work on page two, mood boards on page three where they are usually not read
The order that survives a ninety-second skim. Everything below the fold on page one is read conditionally, and page three is read rarely.

Order beats content here. A kit with mediocre numbers in the right order outperforms a kit with good numbers buried on page two, because the second one is never reached.

Put the identity line first

Then the audience, with denominators

Then who those people are

Keep identifying →

The one-page test

Here is a test worth running on whatever you have now. Print page one. Hand it to somebody who does not know what you do. Give them sixty seconds, take it back, and ask them three questions: what does this person make, who watches it, and how big is it?

If they cannot answer all three, the problem is not your design. It is that the information they needed was not on the page they read.

Our own editorial view, and it is not the fashionable advice: most creators should ship a one-page kit. Two pages is a concession you make when you genuinely have a body of relevant past work to show. Three pages is almost always the sign of a kit built to look substantial rather than to be read.

Section by section, what to put in

Audience make-up

Performance, honestly framed

Past work, if it is relevant

Deliverables and contact

The sections that waste a page

Two-column chart listing media kit sections that earn their space against sections that waste the page, such as long personal philosophy, stock laptop imagery and undated follower counts
The right-hand column is not a style objection. Each of those items either cannot be verified, is not relevant to the decision, or pushes the useful part further down.

Two of those deserve naming outright, because they are so common:

What to do when your numbers are small

Small accounts are not disadvantaged in this document as much as they assume. What a small kit must do differently is compete on something other than size, and there are only really three candidates:

  1. Concentration. A tightly defined audience is easier to sell than a large vague one. Say exactly who follows you.
  2. Behaviour. Saves, shares and comments that show intent rather than approval. Show the raw counts, not just a rate.
  3. Relevance. A kit tailored to the brand, referencing their actual products, beats a generic kit from a bigger account more often than creators expect.
Honest empty: we cannot tell you the follower threshold at which brands start replying, what proportion of pitches get answered, or what a kit is "worth". We have no brand-side survey data and no connected creators to draw on. Anyone publishing those numbers should be asked where they came from, and if the answer is a blog post citing another blog post, discard it.

A checklist you can work through

Work down this once before you send anything. Every line is a yes or a fix.

  1. Page one states who you are and what you cover in one sentence.
  2. Every audience number carries the date it was measured.
  3. Every rate carries the formula and the denominator it used.
  4. Reach and views are averages over a stated period, not a best post.
  5. Country, age and gender splits are present with percentages.
  6. Past work is chosen for relevance to this recipient.
  7. No result is claimed that you could not evidence if asked.
  8. No logo appears for a relationship that was not commercial.
  9. Deliverables are the ones you can actually produce this month.
  10. Exactly one contact route, and it works.
  11. The file is a PDF, named with your name and the date, under about 5 MB.
  12. It reads correctly on a phone, because a good share of recipients will open it on one.

Last verified 1 September 2026. This page contains no platform-specific feature claims, so nothing in it expires on a platform update; the guidance is about document structure, which does not change when an app does.

Frequently asked about media kits

What should a creator media kit include?

Who you are and what you cover, audience size and engagement with the formula named, audience make-up by country, age and gender, two or three relevant past pieces of work, the deliverables you offer, and one contact address. Everything with a measurement date.

How long should a media kit be?

One page for most creators, two if you have genuinely relevant past work to show. Three or more is usually a sign the kit was built to look substantial rather than to be read quickly.

Do you need a media kit as a small creator?

It helps, but it has to compete on something other than size: a tightly defined audience, behaviour that shows intent such as saves and shares, and relevance to the specific brand you are sending it to.

What ruins a media kit?

Undated follower counts, engagement rates with no formula named, a logo wall implying commercial relationships that were not, stock imagery, and putting a personal philosophy above the first number on page one.

Should a media kit include rates?

A range is safer than a single number, and only if you can defend how it was built. Some creators hold rates back deliberately so the first reply is a conversation rather than a yes or no.

Disclosure: LinkToLooks has no connected creators and has earned $0 in affiliate commission to date. Nothing on this page is drawn from a creator we work with, because there are none. Where we have no evidence we say so instead of filling the gap.

Keep going →

LinkToLooks identification desk — we identify objects out of real photographs and check every listing by eye before we link it. Empty beats wrong. About the desk · published 1 September 2026.