How do you choose which products to feature?
Some links here are affiliate links — if you buy, the retailer may pay us a commission at no extra cost to you. We have earned $0 from them so far. Here’s how it works.
Part of: For creators
Four checks, three of them measurable before you write a word. Listing durability — 55.6% of catalogued Corelle listings were already unavailable when we checked, against 11.5% for Tupperware. Retailer depth — one retailer supplied 93% of our vehicles sample and 22% of pet supplies. Price band — medians run from $19.99 to $309.99 by category. Then the judgement call: can you say anything specific?
Four checks, all doable before you write
Choosing products is usually described as taste. Most of it is not. Four things can be checked in a few minutes each and they eliminate most bad candidates before you have written a word.
- Durability of the listing. Will this URL still resolve to this product in a month?
- Depth behind the retailer. Is there more where this came from, or is this retailer the whole category?
- Price band fit. Does the number make sense for the people who read you?
- Specificity. Can you say something about this item that would not be true of its competitor?
Only the fourth is judgement. The first three are measurements, and the rest of this page is how to take them.
Check one: will the link still work?
Retailer type predicts this better than anything else. We ran identical queries with and without an in-stock filter on 2 September 2026; the gap is the share of catalogued listings that are not currently purchasable.
| Product family | Not purchasable | Inventory type |
|---|---|---|
| Corelle | 55.6% | Discontinued patterns, one-of-one |
| Enamelware | 32.2% | Mixed new retail and open stock |
| Pyrex | 27.4% | Mixed |
| Skillet | 14.3% | Ordinary repeatable retail |
| Tupperware | 11.5% | Ordinary repeatable retail |
| Jadeite | 5.6% | Active seller listings |
Method: CJ product API, US advertisers, paired keyword queries run with and without the in-stock filter, 2 September 2026.
Left: a branded skillet stocked by many retailers, restocked continuously, and available at $24.99 from a second retailer in the same pull. Right: a single mug in a discontinued pattern. Both are good recommendations. Only the first belongs in something you expect people to read for a year.
Last verified 2 September 2026 against paired live CJ product-feed queries across six product families plus 21 top-level category samples, taken during this run
Check two: is there depth behind the retailer?
If one retailer is the category, your content plan is really a bet on one commercial relationship. That is fine when you know it and dangerous when you do not. The concentration we measured varies from 93% to 22%.
| Category | Top retailer's share of sample | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicles & parts | 93% | One relationship is the category |
| Arts & entertainment | 92% | Same |
| Food, beverages & tobacco | 90% | Same |
| Home & garden | 82% | Mostly one, with a tail |
| Electronics | 57% | Half and half; plan for both |
| Health & beauty | 53% | Half and half |
| Toys & games | 41% | Genuinely spread |
| Apparel & accessories | 36% | Genuinely spread |
| Animals & pet supplies | 22% | Very spread; join widely |
The practical use is not to avoid concentrated categories — food and home are excellent subjects. It is to know that in those categories, a single approval decision determines most of what you can link, so it should be your first application and not your fifth.
Check three: does the price band fit your readers?
Order value varies fifteen-fold across categories, and the mistake is to read that as a ranking. It is a constraint.
| Category | Median listing | What that implies |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture | $309.99 | Few purchases, long consideration, high value each |
| Luggage & bags | $126.47 | Seasonal spikes, considered purchase |
| Electronics | $99.99 | Specification-driven, comparison-heavy |
| Apparel & accessories | $71.47 | Frequent, fit-dependent, high return rates |
| Home & garden | $55.24 | Broad, repeatable |
| Toys & games | $46.49 | Age-banded, gift-seasonal |
| Health & beauty | $29.47 | Repeat purchase, routine-driven |
| Baby & toddler | $25.99 | High trust bar, thin catalogue |
| Arts & entertainment | $19.99 | Impulse, volume-dependent |
A $20 median category needs volume and repeat purchase to work. A $300 median category needs trust and depth of explanation. Choosing products from a band that does not match how your audience actually reads you is the commonest reason a good recommendation earns nothing.
Check four: can you say anything specific?
The disqualifier. Draft two bullets about the candidate before you commit to it. If they would read identically for a competing product, the item is filler.
- Good: “$20.99 here and $24.99 at a farm retailer for the same pan.” Specific, checkable, useful.
- Good: “Enamel conducts, so the rim gets hot with the drink.” A mechanism, and a drawback.
- Filler: “A beautiful addition to any kitchen.” True of everything.
- Filler: “Built to last.” Also true of everything, and unverifiable.
Frequently asked
How do you choose which products to feature?
Score candidates on four things you can check before you write: how durable the listing is, how deep the retailer's stock is, whether the price band suits your audience, and whether you can say anything specific about the item.
Should I feature expensive products to earn more per sale?
Order value genuinely varies — from a $19.99 median in arts to $309.99 in furniture in our 2 September 2026 pull. But a product your audience will not buy converts at zero regardless of its price.
How do I know if a listing will still be live next month?
Look at the retailer type. Ordinary retail stock is repeatable; peer-to-peer and replacement listings are one-of-one. We measured 55.6% of catalogued Corelle listings already unavailable against 11.5% for Tupperware.
Is it worth featuring products from small retailers?
Sometimes, and check first. Concentration varies hugely: one retailer supplied 93% of our vehicles sample and 22% of our pet supplies sample.
What is the fastest disqualifier?
Not being able to say anything specific. If your bullets would read identically for a competing product, the item does not belong in the piece.
Some links here are affiliate links. LinkToLooks has earned $0 from them to date — no network has approved us yet — so nothing on this page is picked to hit a payout.
Keep reading
How this guide was made. We research and draft these guides with AI, then a person checks every price, link and factual claim against the source before it publishes. We work this way because it lets us re-verify prices across hundreds of guides in a day, which is what keeps the numbers here current; it does not decide what we recommend. Anything we could not verify is labelled as unverified rather than filled in.